According to findings, which stimulation type is superior at affecting overall VAS scores in the SUNBURST study?

The superior effectiveness of burst stimulation in impacting overall Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in the SUNBURST study is attributed to its ability to deliver intermittent bursts of stimulation rather than continuous or steady stimulation. This unique pattern of electrical impulses seems to optimize the mechanism of action, potentially addressing pain modulation more effectively. Burst stimulation can enhance neural communication and alter pain perception pathways, resulting in improved outcomes as reflected by the VAS scores.

Moreover, this stimulation type mimics natural firing patterns of neurons, which can be more conducive to achieving relief from chronic pain. As research demonstrates, burst stimulation creates a more efficient and effective engagement with neural pathways, leading to better overall patient experiences and reduced pain levels as indicated by the VAS scores in the study.

In contrast, other stimulation types like monopolar, linear, and tonic stimulation may not provide the same level of efficacy in altering pain perception and may result in less favorable VAS scores due to differences in how they engage with the nervous system.